Case Study
9-Product NPD Portfolio: Stage-Gate Process Management
Coordinated cross-functional teams and external specialists to advance equipment and consumables through formal quality systems
The Challenge
A bioprocessing company launching their first capital equipment business needed to develop 9 interconnected products through their formal NPD process—one equipment platform plus eight associated consumables.
With their R&D team focused on supporting existing product lines and core business operations, they sought dedicated program management to coordinate the capital equipment initiative, orchestrating internal teams, external specialists, and ensuring progress through stage gates.
- Industry: Bioprocessing / Medical Devices
- Services: NPD Program Management, Cross-Functional Coordination, Documentation Strategy, Stage-Gate Management, Validation Strategy Planning
- Timeline: 2.5 years of program management leadership
- Company Type: Bioprocessing supplier launching capital equipment and associated consumables
Company Background
The company was an established bioprocessing supplier with mature NPD processes and documented SOPs for consumable product development. Their stage-gate methodology ensured quality standards, regulatory requirements, and customer needs were met before market launch.
However, they were now developing an integrated equipment platform with associated consumables—a different scope than their consumables expertise. Capital equipment required expanded coordination spanning mechanical engineering, electrical systems, software development, installation procedures, and device validation protocols.
The program management complexity was substantially greater than consumables development alone.
The NPD Program Challenge
The company faced several interconnected coordination requirements that warranted dedicated program management.
Challenge 1: Portfolio Complexity with 9 Interconnected Products
The initiative required coordinating development of 9 products simultaneously: one integrated equipment platform plus 8 consumable products including different configurations, media supplements, and single-use components.
Each product had interdependencies. Consumables needed compatibility with equipment, equipment design drove consumable specifications, and the system needed to work as an integrated solution. Managing these interdependencies while advancing each product through stage gates required dedicated coordination.
Challenge 2: Multi-Disciplinary Team Coordination
Capital equipment development required coordinating diverse specialists: mechanical engineers handling equipment design, electrical engineers managing systems integration, software programmers developing controller systems, quality specialists establishing validation protocols, manufacturing partners serving as contract manufacturers, and regulatory advisors defining compliance strategy.
Each discipline operated on different timelines and priorities. Coordinating their work into cohesive product development required full-time program management.
Challenge 3: Technical Documentation Strategy
Capital equipment required 400+ pages of technical documentation coordinated across multiple contributors. The program manager needed to define documentation requirements and structure, coordinate engineering teams creating specifications, work with quality teams on risk management documentation, facilitate software documentation by systems programmers, ensure consistency across all deliverables, and integrate documentation from contract manufacturers.
Challenge 4: Stage-Gate Coordination
The company’s stage-gate process required monthly gate reviews where cross-functional teams evaluated progress and documentation. With 9 products moving through gates simultaneously, coordination was needed to schedule and facilitate review meetings, ensure documentation packages were complete, present progress to steering committee, track decisions and action items, and maintain momentum between reviews.
Challenge 5: Validation Strategy Development
Unlike batch-manufactured consumables, the equipment required assembly line manufacturing with components from multiple contract manufacturers. The program manager needed to define overall validation approach and framework, coordinate with validation specialists on protocol requirements, work with quality teams to establish acceptance criteria, facilitate validation planning across manufacturing sites, and establish strategy for customer site validation.
Note: The company would engage validation specialists to write actual IQ/OQ/PQ protocols. The program management role was establishing the strategic framework.
The leadership team recognized these coordination challenges warranted bringing in dedicated NPD program management with capital equipment development experience.
Our Approach
01 | NPD Program Management & Cross-Functional Coordination
MKA assumed dedicated program management leadership for all 9 products, working within the company’s existing stage-gate process. This allowed internal R&D teams to maintain focus on technical execution while ensuring coordinated progress toward commercial readiness.
We facilitated monthly NPD gate review meetings, presenting consolidated progress and recommendations to the cross-functional steering committee. We led weekly coordination meetings with R&D, engineering, quality, manufacturing, and marketing stakeholders to align workstreams, resolve bottlenecks, and ensure interdependencies were managed.
Our role focused on orchestration and coordination rather than direct technical execution—bringing the right resources together at the right time and ensuring all workstreams progressed cohesively.
02 | Documentation Strategy & Team Coordination
We led the strategic approach to creating comprehensive technical documentation for all 9 products, coordinating engineering, quality, and regulatory teams across multiple dimensions.
For documentation framework development, we defined DHF structure and requirements for all products, established templates and documentation standards, created workflows for document creation and review, and coordinated handoffs between different contributors.
Our cross-functional coordination facilitated engineering teams translating requirements into specifications, worked with quality teams coordinating FMEA activities, coordinated with systems programmer on software documentation requirements, ensured manufacturing partners provided required documentation, and integrated customer-facing documentation into overall DHF.
Through review and integration processes, we coordinated document review cycles across teams, ensured consistency in formatting and content across all products, integrated documentation from multiple sources into cohesive deliverables, and maintained documentation tracking and version control.
The 400+ pages of documentation represented work by multiple specialists coordinated through the program management framework we established.
03 | Validation Strategy Framework Development
We established the validation strategy framework for the manufacturing process, coordinating with internal teams and validation specialists.
For strategic framework definition, we developed overall validation philosophy and approach, established validation scope and responsibilities across sites, created master validation plan structure, and identified critical process parameters requiring validation.
Our coordination with specialists involved working with quality teams to define validation requirements, coordinating with validation consultants on protocol frameworks, facilitating discussions on acceptance criteria and test methods, and ensuring alignment between manufacturing sites on validation approach.
Multi-site coordination included coordinating validation planning across contract manufacturers, establishing communication framework for validation activities, facilitating information sharing between manufacturing partners, and ensuring consistency in validation approach across sites.
Note: MKA established the validation strategy and coordination framework. The company engaged validation specialists to develop detailed IQ/OQ/PQ protocols. Our program management engagement concluded before validation protocol execution, which was transitioned to internal teams and specialists.
04 | Product Portfolio Coordination & Dependency Management
With 9 products advancing simultaneously, we maintained coordination frameworks to prevent conflicts and ensure system-level integration.
For dependency tracking and management, we created detailed maps of product interdependencies, facilitated design reviews ensuring component compatibility, coordinated testing across integrated systems, and managed schedule implications of dependency changes.
Our portfolio visibility and reporting created dashboards showing each product’s stage-gate status, tracked upcoming milestones and open issues across portfolio, documented dependencies and their impact on timelines, and provided steering committee with consolidated status reporting.
This coordination enabled informed prioritization and resource allocation decisions across the 9-product portfolio.
05 | Stage-Gate Facilitation & Steering Committee Support
For each monthly gate review, we coordinated preparation of complete documentation packages meeting company SOP requirements.
Pre-gate coordination involved coordinating document preparation across functional teams, ensuring all required information was complete and organized, facilitating internal reviews before steering committee presentation, and identifying and escalating risks requiring leadership attention.
Gate review facilitation included presenting consolidated progress across all 9 products, highlighting critical decisions requiring steering committee input, facilitating discussion of risks and mitigation approaches, and documenting decisions and action items for follow-up.
Post-gate execution communicated decisions and direction to all workstreams, tracked action items to completion, and maintained momentum between formal gate reviews.
By providing consistent program management throughout the 2.5-year engagement, we kept all 9 products advancing through gates on schedule.
The Impact
9 Products Advanced to Validation-Ready Status
All 9 products successfully progressed through the company’s formal stage-gate NPD process, advancing from concept through design verification to validation-ready status under coordinated program management. This portfolio provided the complete commercial offering needed for market launch, with each product meeting quality standards and regulatory requirements.
The coordination ensured that internal teams, external specialists, and contract manufacturers worked cohesively toward common milestones.
Documentation Strategy Executed
The 400+ pages of DHF and supporting documentation represented coordinated work across multiple engineering disciplines, quality teams, manufacturing partners, and regulatory advisors. Our program management ensured consistent documentation standards across all contributors, proper integration of technical content from diverse sources, traceability from customer requirements through verification, and documentation packages that supported regulatory compliance.
The strategic framework we established enabled the company to coordinate complex technical documentation that positioned them for commercial launch and future regulatory submissions.
Validation Strategy Framework Established
The validation strategy framework provided comprehensive approach for proving manufacturing process control. Our program management defined validation philosophy and master planning approach, coordinated validation requirements across multiple manufacturing sites, established framework for protocol development by validation specialists, and created communication and coordination processes across partners.
The strategic framework provided clear roadmap that enabled the company to transition validation protocol development and execution to internal quality teams and validation specialists after our program management engagement concluded in March 2022.
Cross-Functional Coordination Achieved
Despite managing 9 products simultaneously with multiple engineering disciplines, external specialists, and contract manufacturers, the NPD program maintained coordinated progress throughout the 2.5-year engagement.
Our program management approach—orchestrating rather than directly executing all technical work—allowed the company to leverage their internal expertise and specialized consultants while maintaining strategic direction and cohesive progress.
Strategic Resource Coordination
By providing program management leadership that coordinated internal teams and external specialists, MKA enabled the company to access diverse expertise at the right times. Engineering teams focused on technical execution, validation specialists engaged for protocol development, contract manufacturers coordinated for production readiness, and quality teams supported for documentation and compliance.
Our role was ensuring these diverse resources worked cohesively toward common objectives, not replacing their specialized expertise.
Organizational Capability Building
By working embedded within the organization, MKA transferred program management methodologies and coordination practices. Company personnel gained exposure to complex portfolio management, cross-functional coordination, and stage-gate discipline for capital equipment development—capabilities that would benefit future initiatives.
The program management frameworks, coordination tools, and communication processes became organizational assets applicable to subsequent projects.
Facing a similar challenge?
Let’s discuss how we can help.